MOSES AND THE PROPHETS

 

          A few years ago, Dr. John Warwick Montgomery, a distinguished Lutheran scholar, debated Dr. Joseph Fletcher, the infamous situation ethicist. Dr. Fletcher insisted that Jesus had no more philosophical sophistication than a guinea pig. It is strange that someone with so little philosophical sophistication has for two thousand years been the most influential teacher and leader in the world. What marvels could he have wrought if he had had the philosophical sophistication of Joseph Fletcher? Tragically, if our Lord had promoted the ethical values of men like Joseph Fletcher, John Shelby Spong and Leslie Weatherhead, our world might have already destroyed itself. Fletcher and Spong believed and taught the ethics of barnyard animals.

 

         Most liberal theologians would not employ the crude language Joseph Fletcher used concerning Jesus Christ. The great majority of liberal theologians profess some respect for Christ, but few, if any, of them accept the Bible's teaching about Christ. They seem to believe that Christ was a great teacher and a good man, but they deny that Jesus turned water into wine, stilled the storm on the Sea of Galilee, raised dead Lazarus, and rose from the dead. They do not believe he is our only Savior and will return at the end of the age. Let me put this truth as plainly and bluntly as possible:  The Jesus of liberal theology is the figment of men's fertile imagination. If the liberal theologians were right about Christ, Christianity would have died at least nineteen hundreds years ago and should have.

 

          We know from Christ's own words that God gave Christ all authority in heaven and in earth (Mt. 28:18). We know that he spoke on many occasions by his own authority. But we also know of his reliance on God's word as revealed through Moses and the prophets. Do you remember what he said to the rich man in Luke 16? Jesus told the story of the rich man and Lazarus. The Bible says that angels carried Lazarus to the bosom of Abraham. But the rich man lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. The rich man cried out, "Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue: for I am tormented in this flame." Abraham told the rich man that there was a great gulf between the two of them. There was no possibility of passing from one side to the other. The rich man explained that he had five brothers. He did not want them to come to the place of torment. He asked Abraham to send someone to warn them. "Abraham says to him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them (your brothers) hear them. And he (the rich man) said, No, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. And he (Abraham) said unto him, If they will not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead" (Lk. 16:22-31).

 

          Before we discuss the topic, "Moses and the Prophets," I must say a few words about Abraham's response to the rich man. He said to the rich man: "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead" (Lk. 16:31). Does Abraham's response to the rich man make sense to you? Surely if one were to come back from the dead people would believe his word and obey him. Jesus Christ predicted his own resurrection. When he was raised from the dead, thousands and thousands of his own countrymen refused to believe in him. There is an abundance of evidence to prove that Christ was raised. But for the past two thousand years, multiplied millions of people-including many liberal theologians-have denied our Lord's resurrection. They have failed to be persuaded even though Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

 

           The writers of the Old Testament claimed to be revealing God's will for the people of Israel. There are literally hundreds of times when Moses and the prophets claimed to be speaking for God. Moses warned the Israelites: "Now therefore hearken, o Israel, unto the statutes and judgments, which I teach you, for to do them, that you may live, and go in and possess the land which the Lord God of your fathers gives you.   

 

          You shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish ought from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you" (Dt. 4: 1-2). Over and over, Moses reminds the Israelites that the law he was teaching them did not come from his own heart; it came from the very mind of God almighty.

 

         When Moses died, God appointed Joshua to be the leader of the nation. God demanded of Joshua: "Be strong and of good courage: for unto this people shall you divide for an inheritance the land, which I swore unto their fathers to give them. Only be strong and very courageous, that you may observe to do according to all the law, which Moses my servant commanded you: turn not from the right hand or to the left, that you may prosper wherever you go. This book of the law shall not depart out of your mouth; but you shall meditate therein day and night, that you may observe to do all that is written therein: for then shall you make your way prosperous, and then you shall have good success" (Josh. 1: 6-8). Joshua obeyed the voice of the Lord. "There was not a word of all that Moses commanded, which Joshua did not read before the whole congregation of Israel, with the women, and the little ones, and the strangers that lived among them" (Josh. 8:35).

 

       Tragically and inexplicably, the Israelites did not always obey the Law of Moses. Eventually, because of their disobedience, the Jews had to spend seventy years in Babylonian exile. Daniel was one the young men who spent those seventy years in Babylon. Daniel 9 records the great prophet's confession for himself and for the Israelite people. Please listen to Daniel's confession. "0 Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them who love him, and to them who keep his commandments; we have sinned, and have committed iniquity, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled, even by departing from thy precepts and from thy judgments; neither have we hearkened unto thy servants the prophets, who spoke in thy name, to our kings, our princes, and our fathers, and to all the people of the land.... Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him" (Dan. 9:4-6, 11). It should be evident from this reading that the Israelites were exiled to Babylon because they did not obey Moses and the prophets.

 

          After the Jews returned from Babylon, Nehemiah became the governor of the nation. Nehemiah also confessed the sins of the Israelite people. "0 Lord God of heaven, the great and terrible God, who keeps covenant and mercy for them who love him and observe his commandments: let thine ear now be attentive, and thine eyes open, that thou mayest hear the prayer of thy servant, which I pray before thee now, day and night, for the children of Israel thy servants, and confess the sins of the children of Israel, which we have sinned against thee: both I and my father's house have sinned. We have dealt corruptly against thee, and have not kept thy commandments, nor the statutes, nor the judgments, which thou commandest thy servant Moses" (Neh. 1:5-7). Nehemiah reminded the Israelites of the warnings God had given through Moses to the nation of Israel (Neh. 1:8). The Jews had sinned by profaning the Sabbath (Neh.13:17-18). Failing to honor Moses and the prophets had brought the Israelites to shame.

 

         The Old Testament has much more to say about keeping the law, but I shall turn now to the New Testament. The book of Luke, written by a Greek physician, sometimes appeals to the Law of Moses. He says concerning Christ: "And when the days of her (Mary's) purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him (Jesus) to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; as it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male who opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord" (Lk. 2:22-23). Luke also records a conversation between Christ and two disciples who were walking along on the road to Emmaus. As they walked, they talked about the events that had been transpiring in Jerusalem. Jesus appeared to them, although they did not recognize him. He asked them what they were discussing as they walked together. He could perceive the sadness in their eyes. They asked him if he were the only person who did not know what had been occurring in Jerusalem. They told him they were talking about "Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people: and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he who should have redeemed Israel: and beside all of this, to day is the third day since these things happened" (Lk. 24: 13-21).

 

          Jesus said to the two disciples: "0 fools, and slow of heart to believe, all that the prophets have spoken: ought not the Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them all the scriptures concerning himself' (Lk. 24:25-27). Later in the meeting with the two disciples, Christ asked them for something to eat. They offered him broiled fish. He then said to them: "These are the words that I spoke unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the Law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the Psalms, concerning me" (Lk. 24:42-44).

 

          Jesus identified three divisions of the Old Testament: the Law of Moses, the prophets and the psalms. These three divisions encompass every book in the Old Testament. The late Dr. Edward Young was one of America's premier Hebrew scholars. In the book, The Infallible Word (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1953), edited by N. B. Stonehouse and Paul Wooley, Dr. Young makes these appropriate comments on the Law of Moses, the prophets and the psalms: “Here he (Christ) recognizes that there are three divisions to the Old Testament, and that the things which were written in each of these divisions must be fulfilled. The designation 'Law of Moses' refers, of course, to the first five books of the Bible; the 'prophets' includes the historical books and the works of the great writing prophets. As to the identity of these two divisions there would seem to be little doubt. What, however, is meant by Christ's use of the word 'psalms?' Did he thereby intend to refer to all the books in the third division of the canon, or did he merely have in mind the book of Psalms? The latter alternative, we think, is probably correct" (pp. 58-59). There are other scholars who believe the word "psalms" refers to all the books not included under the headings "the Law of Moses and the prophets." Incidentally, on one occasion Jesus used a two-division summary of the Old Testament. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus said to his disciples: "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I have not come to destroy, but to fulfill" (Mt. 5: 17).

 

            John Hagee's latest book, In Defense of Israel (Lake Mary, FL: FrontLine, 2007), severely criticizes those of us who believe the church has replaced Israel as the elect nation. He even argues that those of us who preach replacement theology in a very real sense have led to the atrocities that have been directed toward the Jewish people through the centuries (p. 121). I wonder if Hagee knows what the author of Hebrews taught on that topic. The book of Hebrews quotes Jesus himself as saying to God the Father: "Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, a God. Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law." Please listen to what Jesus Christ said to God the Father: "Lo, I come to do thy will, a God. He takes away the first, that he may establish the second. By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all" (Heb. 10:7-10). Hagee dogmatically affirms: "The church has not replaced Israel" (p. 145). The apostle Peter vigorously disagrees with John Hagee. Peter referred to Christians as constituting "a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession" (1 Pet. 2:9). The nation of Israel is not now God's elect nation; the church of our Lord is.

 

          Hagee says that our Lord "personally validated the divine authority of the Old Covenant by saying, I did not come to destroy but to fulfill (Mt. 5: 17). He continues in the next verse to declare that the Old Covenant would be valid 'till heaven and earth pass away." Since heaven and earth have not passed away; neither has the Old Covenant" (p. 169). There is no doubt that Jesus Christ validated the old covenant. I have given you evidence of that from Luke 24. But if the Mosaic covenant is still binding, the book of Hebrews needs to be revised. Do you remember reading these words about the two covenants-the new covenant and the old covenant? "In that he says, A new covenant, he has made the first old. Now that which decays and waxes old is ready to vanish away" (Heb. 8: 13). The English Standard Version renders that verse. "In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away."

 

          You have heard preachers discourage the practice of taking a passage out of context. That is precisely what John Hagee has done in this most recent book and in his other books. Will you please listen to these verses from Christ's great Sermon on the Mount? "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, and the prophets: I have not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle shalt in no wise pass, until all be fulfilled (or accomplished)" (Mt. 5:17-18). Did you take note of the expression, "until all be fulfilled?" The word "until" suggests a time when the law and the prophets would be fulfilled. We know that covenant has been fulfilled and has been removed. Is that not what Christ meant when he said to the Father: "Lo, I come to do thy will, a God?" The author of Hebrews comments: "He takes away the first, that he may establish the second" (Heb. 10:9). "First" and "second" what? He was speaking of the first and second covenants-the Law of Moses and the gospel of Christ. Robert Miligan's New Testament Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (St. Louis: Christian Board of Publication, 1875) says concerning the expression, "He takes away the first that he may establish the second": "The thing taken out of the way is not merely the Levitical sacrifices, but the whole arrangement under which they were offered, and the thing established is the more gracious and perfect arrangement according to which the offering of Christ was made once for all" (pp. 271-272).

 

          These passages teach as plainly as words can be made that no one is authorized to obey any of the precepts and commandments of the Mosaic covenant. Sometimes preachers argue: "Nine of the Ten Commandments are binding on us." That cannot be scripturally justified. We do not live under the law that requires that we keep even one of the Ten Commandments. If we must keep any of the Ten Commandments, we must keep all of them. Is that not what Jesus meant when he told his disciples:  "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven" (Mt. 5: 19)?

 

         The truth which John Hagee and other preachers ignore is the fact that Jesus Christ did not live under the new covenant. From the time he was born until his death, he lived under the Mosaic covenant. He strongly condemned any of his Jewish contemporaries for breaking any of the commandments of the Law of Moses. He loved the law of God as revealed in the Old Testament, but he came to establish the New Testament. Every serious student of the Bible is familiar with these words: "For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ" (John 1: 17).

 

         John Hagee affirms: "The Old Covenant is not dead" (p. 158). The apostle Paul must have thought it was. He informed the Colossians: God blotted "the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to the cross." How do we know Paul had in mind the Mosaic covenant? He tells us very plainly. "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect to a holyday, or of the new moon, or of the Sabbath days" (Col. 2: 14, 16). All of these items were significant parts of the Mosaic covenant. They have all been nailed to the cross. They are no longer binding on anyone-either Jew or Gentile. Anyone who seeks to be justified by the Law of Moses has fallen from grace (Gal 5:4).

 

Winford Claiborne

The International Gospel Hour

P.O. Box 118

Fayetteville, TN 37334