UNIQUENESS OF CHRIST

 

When our second son was born, I bought my Molly a larger diamond than I could have afforded when we first married. About twenty years later, I bought her an even larger diamond. When I bought the third diamond, I told the jeweler that I would trade in her second diamond on the larger one. But when I gave Molly the third diamond at Christmas and explained that I needed to trade in her other diamond, she balked. She said: "That is Danny's diamond and I am not giving it up." She said I could take the other diamond back to the jewelers. You can probably guess what happened. She kept both of them. When we moved to Fayetteville, she wanted to mount both diamonds on one ring. Everyone who saw her new ring thought it was beautiful and unusual. She wanted and had a unique ring.

 

The Concise Oxford English Dictionary (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004) defines the word "unique" as "being the only one of its kind, unlike anything else" (p. 1578). I am aware that we sometimes use words rather loosely. We may say that an item or a person or a practice is unique when it really is not. But there is a legitimate use of the word, as I shall demonstrate in our lesson today on "The Uniqueness of Christ." There are a number of prominent scholars who are concerned about the many attacks on Christ. Many of those scholars have written books defending Christ's uniqueness. I shall mention two of those books. In his book, The Uniqueness of Christ (Grand Rapids: Monarch Books, 2001), Chris Wright insists: "So, in matters of truth, exclusivism is not a negative attitude, but a simple necessity of human thought and speech" (p. 39). Even though Chris Wright does not use the word "unique" in this brief excerpt, he is arguing that Jesus is our exclusive and unique Savior. He is the only one of a kind, unlike anyone else. At one time Lee Strobel was an atheist. But he examined the evidence for the deity of Christ and became a believer. He has written a number of books defending the truth about Christ. In his very latest book, The Case for the Real Jesus: A Journalist Investigates Current Attacks on the Identity of Christ (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007), Lee Stobel confesses: "After nearly two years of studying ancient history and archaeology, I found the evidence leading me to the unexpected verdict that Jesus is the unique Son of God who authenticated his divinity by returning from the dead" (p. 13).

 

There are features of Christ as a person and of his life that are not unique-­features that are common to man. After all, he was born of a woman, just as all of us were born of a woman. He grew up in an insignificant town among uneducated or undereducated people. The prophet Isaiah 750 years before Christ was born provided insight into the kind of person the Messiah would be. "For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of dry ground: he has no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him" (Isa. 53:2). In his excellent commentary, Exposition of Isaiah (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1971), Dr. H. C. Leupold, a distinguished Lutheran scholar, says concerning the verse I read to you from Isaiah: "The humble beginnings of his (Christ's) life seem inauspicious. When he grew up as a lad in the streets of Nazareth, who took any particular note of him? He could be likened to an insignificant' shoot,' a bit of vegetation that is scarcely noticed.... So no one attaches particular importance to a 'root coming up from arid soil'" (volume 2, p. 226).

 

We would expect the Jewish Messiah-the Savior of the world-to be university educated or to come from a prominent family or to have great riches. That is not how our Lord came into the world. If you did not know his spectacular miracles and his powerful teaching, you probably would not have known he would have the power to save the world from sin. He looked like any other Jewish man in the first century. He apparently worked with his hands like other men. He ate the same food, offered the same sacrifices, attended the same synagogue and lived just like all other faithful Jews of his generation. None of that makes Jesus of Nazareth unusual or unique. So what is there about Christ that places him in a class by himself?

 

Jesus Christ is the only world religion's founder whose birth, life, death and resurrection were the objects of prophecies that were made hundreds and hundreds of years before he was born. Time will allow me to summarize just a few of those Old Testament prophecies. The very first book of the Bible points to the coming of Jesus Christ. After Adam and Eve rebelled against God, the Lord God himself predicted of the serpent: "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; it shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel" (Gen. 3:15). In his book, The Genesis Record: A Scientific & Devotional Commentary on the Book of Beginnings (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1976), Dr. Henry Morris paraphrases the Lord's words to the serpent (Satan's representative): "There will come One who will not be of the man's seed, and who therefore will not be under your dominion. He will be uniquely the Seed of the woman, miraculously conceived and virgin-born. Though you will succeed in grievously injuring Him, He will completely crush you and all your evil ambitions" (p. 120).

 

Was God predicting the virgin birth of our Savior? Of this you can be absolutely certain: the virgin birth of Christ was one of the most unusual events in the history of the world. I am fully aware that most liberal theologians like John Shelby Spong and Leslie Weatherhead deny the virgin birth of Christ. Frankly, I prefer the words of the Holy Spirit to the rantings and ravings of radical theologians. The great Messianic prophet predicted: "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel" (Isa.7:14). By divine inspiration, both Matthew and Luke record the fulfillment of that remarkable prophecy (Mt. 1 :22-23; Lk. 1 :31-35). Please remember that Luke was a Greek physician who would not have reported this event had there been the slightest doubt about its accuracy.

 

Not one of the founders of the so-called "great religions" can point to even one prophecy that foretold his coming and the work he would do. Jesus alone fulfills hundreds of prophecies from the Old Testament. Does this not prove his uniqueness among all the founders of the various religions and all the leaders in those religions? In my judgment, there is no stronger argument for the uniqueness of Christ than the fulfillment of prophecy. The apostle Peter mentions the transfiguration of Christ and then adds: "We have something more sure, the word of prophecy; whereunto you do well that you take heed, as unto a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit" (2 Pet. 1:19-21). So how did Isaiah know 750 years before Jesus was born that he would be born of a virgin? How did Micah, Isaiah's younger contemporary, know Christ would be born in Bethlehem of Judea? The answer to both questions is simple: Isaiah, Micah and all the other true prophets "spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit."

 

The teachings of Jesus prove conclusively that he was unique among all the founders of the other religions. Oh I am aware that many of our Lord's teachings were grounded in the Old Testament. On one occasion, the Pharisees asked Jesus: "Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?" Christ answered: "Have you not read, that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they two shall be one flesh" (Mt. 19:3-5)? Our Lord was quoting the words of Genesis 1:26-27 and Genesis 2:24. The New Testament records dozens of other examples of Christ's use of the Old Testament.

 

Many of Christ's ideas were almost certainly known in Rome, in Greece and in other countries. In other words, people from virtually every culture under the sun accepted many of the great truths Jesus taught. But much of what Christ taught and the way he taught it was unique. For example, no other teacher in the history of the world ever used parables so extensively and effectively as Christ did. A careful reading of the four gospel records will convince anyone of that fact. When Christ had completed his Sermon on the Mount, the people knew they had heard a unique sermon from a unique teacher. "And it came to pass, when he had finished these sayings (that is, the sayings of the Sermon on the Mount), the people were astonished at his doctrine: for he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes" (Mt. 7:28-29). Simply comparing and contrasting Christ's Sermon on the Mount with any other treatise on moral and spiritual values should convince any honest person of Christ's uniqueness as a teacher.

 

Which of the founders of the so-called "great religions" ever performed the spectacular miracles Christ performed? Time will not allow for a complete listing of our Lord's great miracles. Jesus claimed to be able to raise dead people. Jesus told some of his Jewish countrymen: "My Father works until now, and I work." The Jews understood what many modem theologians seem not to understand. They knew that Christ was claiming equality with God. They wanted to kill him because they believed he was guilty of blasphemy. And he was guilty of blasphemy if he were not equal with the Father. He responded: "For as the Father raises up the dead, and quickens them; even so the Son quickens whom he will" (John 5:17, 21). The word "quicken" means to make alive. Could Jesus actually raise dead people, as he claimed?

 

The book of John tells of Christ's raising Lazarus. Someone reported to Jesus Christ that his friend Lazarus was sick. Jesus stayed two days in the place where he was before he left to go to the home of Mary, Martha and Lazarus. He told his disciples: "Our friend Lazarus sleeps; but I go, that I may awaken him out of his sleep." His disciples said, "If he sleeps, he shall do well." Then Jesus said very plainly: "Lazarus is dead. I am glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent that you may believe; nevertheless let us go unto him." Martha was disturbed that Jesus had not come more quickly to their home. She believed that Christ could have saved her brother from dying. Jesus said to her: "Your brother shall rise again." She knew he would be raised in the last day. Then Jesus told Martha: "I am the resurrection and the life: he who believes in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: and whosoever lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?" Martha replied: "Yes, Lord, I believe that thou art the Christ the Son of God, which should come into the world" (John 11: 3-27).

 

How many of the founders of the so-called "great religions" would have made these remarkable claims? If they had made the claims, could they have performed what Jesus did? I am aware that Richard Roberts reported that his father, Oral Roberts, had resuscitated a child who had died in one of the Roberts' evangelistic campaigns. But no reasonable person believes that. But please listen to what occurred in Bethany at the house of Mary, Martha and Lazarus. Jesus asked that the stone covering the grave of Lazarus be removed. He lifted up his eyes to the Father and prayed: "Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me. And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people who stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me. And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth. And he who was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with grave clothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus says unto them, Loose him, and let him go" (John 11: 41-44). Incidentally, the Pharisees did not deny the great miracle Jesus had performed. Their only concern was how to stop his influence from growing.

 

If the founder of any of the so-called "great religions" had stood before a grave and commanded the occupant to come forth, he probably would have been carried away by men in white coats or whatever color coats they wore in those days. Not one of those founders ever attempted to raise a dead person. The reason they did not try was because they knew they did not have the power. Jesus Christ alone had the power over life and death. Jesus said to his disciples: "I am the bread of life: he who comes to me shall never hunger; and he who believes on me shall never thirst. ... And this is the Father's will who has sent me, that of all whom he has given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. And this is the will of him who sent me, that everyone who sees the Son, and believes on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day" (John 6:35, 39-40). Did any of the founders of the different religions ever promise anyone: "I will raise him up at the last day?" They did not make such a promise. Jesus Christ is unique in that respect, as in many other respects.

 

Jesus Christ is unique in that he foretold his death and his resurrection. What did Christ mean when he told his disciples: "Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many" (Mt. 20:28)? Several times in John Jesus Christ spoke of being lifted up. Was he foretelling the manner of his death? If you have any doubt, please listen to these words from John: "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, shall draw all men unto me. This he said, signifying what death he should die" (John 12:32-33). It is conceivable that a man might correctly predict the manner of his death, but who has ever successfully predicted his resurrection? The answer to my question is very simple: Only Christ has ever foretold his resurrection. In his Parable of the Good Shepherd, Jesus told his disciples: "Therefore does my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it up again. No man takes it (my life) from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have the power to lay it down, and I have the power to take it again. This commandment have I received of the Father" (John 10:17-18).

 

There are other wonderful miracles I would like to discuss with you, but let us consider the most spectacular miracle of all-the resurrection of our Lord. Do you have any idea where the founders of the so-called "great religions" are today? Moses was not the founder of Judaism, although some theologians seem to believe he was. But where is the great lawgiver today? His body is still in the grave and will be until the final resurrection? David was Israel's greatest king and a hero to millions of Jews and Christians? Do you know where David is today? In case you have forgotten, let the apostle Peter remind you. In his great sermon on the day of Pentecost, Peter quoted these words from King David: "I foresaw the Lord always before my face, for he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved: therefore did not my heart rejoice, and my tongue was made glad; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope: because thou wilt not leave my soul in Hades, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou shall make me full of joy with thy countenance." Whom did King David have in mind? The apostle Peter leaves no room for doubt. "Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his grave is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; he seeing this before spoke of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in Hades, neither did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus has God raised up, whereof we are all witnesses" (Acts 2:25-32). Jesus alone is unique in that he was raised from the dead to die no more.

 

The apostle Paul affirms that Jesus Christ "was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; and declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead" (Rom. 1: 3-4). The word "declared" is a translation of the Greek horizo, a word that comes into English in the word "horizon." In his great set of books, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1931), Dr. A. T. Robertson, one of the world's greatest Greek scholars, comments on the word "declared": Jesus Christ "was the Son of God in his preincarnate state and still so after his incarnation, but it was the resurrection of the dead that definitely marked Jesus off as God's Son because of his claims about himself as God's Son and his prophecy that he would rise again on the third day" (volume 4, p. 3:24).

 

In view of the information I have given you today, how can there be any doubt about the uniqueness of Christ? But believing these great truths is not enough. We must love God sufficiently to obey the gospel. Is that not what Christ meant when he said: "If you love me, keep my commandments" (John 14: 15)?

 

Winford Claiborne

The International Gospel Hour

P.O. Box 118

Fayetteville, TN 37334

Back to Home Page

Back to Transcripts Titles