EAT, DRINK AND BE MERRY
The apostle Paul preached in many cities in Asia Minor
and in Europe. When he visited the city of Athens, Greece, "his spirit was
stirred within him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry" (Acts
17:16). The Greek word translated "stirred" means provoked, stimulated
or irritated. And why would not the spirit of any reasonable man be provoked or
irritated when he witnessed the proliferation of idols in the most intellectual city in
the world? After all, Athens was the city of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Hypocrites,
Demosthenes and many other brilliant scholars. Paul had to wonder how a city
with such a rich intellectual heritage could be devoted to gods that men had
made with their own hands. The philosophers in Athens were like the people in
Rome. "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed
the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,
and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things" (Rom. 1:22-23).
While Paul was in Athens, he encountered some Epicurean
and Stoic philosophers.
Stoicism was a major school of Greek philosophy. Zeno of Citium
was its founder. Stoicism derived its name from the Painted Porch (stoa) where Zeno taught. Seneca, Epictetus
and Marcus Aurelius were prominent Stoics. Seneca was one of Paul's
contemporaries. One of the chief characteristics of Stoicism was freedom from
emotion. Webster's Third New International Dictionary defines the
word "stoic" as follows: "Not affected by passion or feeling: especially
manifesting indifference to pleasure or pain." We sometimes say, "He faces
his difficulties with a stoical attitude." The same dictionary defines
"stoicism" as follows: "The principles or the philosophical system of the Stoics
who based an austere ethics on a pantheistic cosmology holding that the world is
governed by and is the embodiment of logos (or reason), that it is man's duty
to conform freely to natural law and his destiny, that virtue is the highest
good, and the
wise man should be free of passion equally, unperturbed by joy or grief (p.
2248). The
Evangelical Dictionary of Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House,
1984), edited
by Walter A. Elwell, says concerning Stoicism:
"Christians...differed with stoics on suicide and found certain other Stoic
teachings objectionable, including materialism, fatalism, doctrine of endless
world cycles, and belief in total divine immanence" (p. 1056).
What about the Epicureans whom Paul encountered on Mars
Hill in Athens? Who were they and what did they believe? Epicurus lived
between 341 and 270 B. C. According to Epicureanism, the good life is one that
brings the most happiness and joy now. Contrary to what many have surmised, the
Epicureans were not necessarily devoted to sensual pleasure, although there
were probably many who were. The late Dr. Carl F. H. Henry's book, Christian
Personal Ethics (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans
Publishing Co., 1957), says concerning Epicureanism: "The happy life
accepts the limits fixed by nature, and avoids extremes; it observes the
systematic restraints, and is not overly-given to the pleasures of eating,
drinking, sex, or anything else. Hence there is little of
crass hedonism in Epicureanism" (pp. 32-33). Epicurus was deeply
concerned about avoiding pain. His philosophy did not obligate anyone to
perform any duty.
When I was first introduced to Epicureanism—whether in
high school or college, I do not remember—we were told that the motto of the
Epicureans was: "Eat, drink and be merry; for tomorrow you die." If
Epicurus used that expression, I have not been able to find it in any of the
materials I have read on Epicureanism. He did want to maximize pleasure and minimize
pain, but he did not endorse the sensual life that some people have imagined. I
have never met anyone who claimed to be an Epicurean, but I have known many people
who accepted the philosophy of Epicurus.
Luke mentions a man who requested that Christ tell his
brother to divide the inheritance with him. Our Lord asked the man, "Who
made me a judge or a divider over you?" He then exhorted him: "Take
heed and beware of covetousness: for a man's life does not consist of
the things that he possesses." Christ then spoke a parable with which all
Bible students are familiar. A rich man prospered greatly. His crops were so abundant he had no
place to store his fruits. He said to himself, "This will I do: I will pull down my barns,
and build greater, and there will I bestow all my fruits and goods. And I will
say to my soul, Soul, you have much goods laid up for
many years; take your ease, eat, drink and be merry." Our Lord did not
add: "For tomorrow we shall die." Jesus called the man a fool and
said his soul would be required of him that very night. "So is he who lays
up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God" (Lk.
12:13-21).
Epicurus or one of his followers may have invented the
expression, "Eat, drink and be merry." It probably was a saying that was
well known in the first century of the Christian era. But whatever the case, the philosophy
behind the term has been around for a very long time. There have always been
people who lived for the moment. They do not have and never have had any
long-range plans. All one has to do to confirm that observation is to study the
history of ancient cities like Rome and Corinth. Paul explains: When the
Romans "knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and
their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves
to be wise, they-became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God
into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beasts, and
creeping things. Wherefore God gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of
their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves: who changed
the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who
is blessed forever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for
even the women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in
their lusts
one toward another; men with men, working that which is unseemly, and receiving
in
themselves that recompense of their error which was appropriate" (Rom.
1:21-27). In the words of one popular country song, "They were living just for
the day." A final judgment apparently did not enter their wicked minds, or
if it did, they were not overly concerned about it.
In his great chapter on the resurrection, Paul
emphatically taught that Christ's resurrection guarantees our resurrection. He
wrote: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is vain; you are yet in
your sins. Then they also who are fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most
miserable" (1 Cor. 15:17-19). Later in
the same chapter, Paul asked: "If after the manner of men I have fought
with beasts at Ephesus, what advantage is it to me, if the dead rise not? Let
us eat and drink; for tomorrow we die" (1 Cor.
15:32). We are not told who or what the beasts at Ephesus were, but most likely they
were vicious and bitter enemies of the cross of Christ—not wild beasts such as
lions or tigers. But why would Paul or any other man risk his life for the
cause of Christ if there will be no resurrection of the dead?
When Paul used the expression—"Let us eat and
drink; for tomorrow we die"— he was not referring to Epicurus or to any
other Greek philosopher. He was quoting the words of Isaiah, the great 8th
century B. C. Hebrew prophet. Isaiah wrote: "And in that day did the Lord
God of hosts call to weeping, and to mourning, and to baldness, and to girding
with sackcloth: and behold joy and gladness, slaying oxen, and killing sheep,
eating flesh, and drinking wine: let us eat and drink; for tomorrow we shall
die" (Isa. 22:12-13). The Lord wanted his people to
repent and turn to him for forgiveness. But instead of weeping, mourning and girding with
sackcloth, the people were devoted to joy and gladness. In his Biblical
Commentary on the Prophecies of Isaiah (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1950, a reprint), Dr. Franz Delitzsch, affirmed: These verses "do not imply that they feel
any pleasure in the thought of death, but indicates a love of life which scoffs
at death" (volume 1, p. 396).
Thoughts of death and eternity should be uppermost in
our minds. That was precisely what Paul meant when he exhorted the Colossian
Christians: "If you then be risen with Christ, seek
those things that are above, where Christ sits on the right hand of God. Set
your affection on things above, not on things on the earth. For you are dead, and your life is
hidden with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life shall appear, then shall you also
appear with him in glory" (Col. 3:1-4). The verbs "seek" and
"set your
affection" are present tense. The Holy Spirit demands that we keep on
seeking those
things that are above and keep on setting our affection on things that are
above.
The Epicureans would probably be called "secular
humanists" in our day. If they believed in God or gods, they apparently
were not overtly influenced by their belief. Dr. Bernard Ramm's
book, The Right, the Good, and the Happy (Waco: Word Books, 1971), says
concerning humanism: It maintains "that the only life is this life,
the only values are now values, and the only goods are this life's
goods" (p. 78). Dr. Charles Hartshorne's book, Beyond Humanism:
Essays in the Philosophy of Nature (Lincoln: University of Nebraska,
Press, 1937), affirms: "Humanism... amounts to two claims. First, it implies
that….man is evidently alone in the universe, dependent for friendship with his own kind. Second, it maintains that the recognition of this loneliness will aid
rather than hinder the good life on earth" (pp. 2-3). If people
accept that philosophy, why would they not "eat, drink and be merry?”
If this life is all there is—as atheists, agnostics,
secular humanists and other unbelievers argue—what possible motive could they
invent or discover that would lead them to think about the good, the beautiful
and the right? I know there are honorable atheists, agnostics, secular
humanists and other unbelievers. Some of these people are conservative morally
and politically. They are devoted to what they believe are their duties. They
encourage others to do good for their families and for the nation. They would die for their
families and for their country. But why would any unbeliever do anything he does
not want to do? Since there will be no final judgment, according to his
beliefs, he will not have to give an account for doing wrong or for failing to
do right. He may do good without believing in God and in
life after death, but he cannot give a logical reason for his behavior. He may be
good and do good because he wants to—not because he has a
sacred obligation to do so. That is not a very solid foundation for a person's conduct.
We live in an entertainment-saturated society. Many
Americans claim to believe in God, but do not act as if he has any claim on their
lives or as if they have any obligations to serve him. They spend more money on
having a good time than in helping to spread the gospel of Christ. I have known
members of the body of Christ who take cruises, purchase the very latest
entertainment technology, go to all the football and basketball games, but give
little time and effort to the cause of Christ. The author of Hebrews
had such people in mind when he wrote: "Let us hold fast the profession of faith
without wavering; (for he is faithful who promised;) and let us consider one
another to provoke unto love and good works: not forsaking the assembling of
ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another, and so
much the more, as we see the day approaching" (Heb. 10:23-25).
I am not arguing that it is wrong to take cruises or to
play golf or to go fishing. But we must not allow any activity to keep us from
our duties to God and to our families. My father was an avid hunter. In fact, he
probably enjoyed hunting more than any person I have ever known. But he never
allowed his devotion to hunting to interfere with the work and worship of the
church or with his responsibilities to our family. He set a wonderful example
for his children and for others who knew him. He did not subscribe to the
Epicurean philosophy.
Both John and James were concerned that the Christians
who read their epistles would be devoted to pleasure. John charged his readers:
"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that
is in the world, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of
life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passes away, and
the
lust thereof: but he who does the will of God abides forever" (1 John
2:15-17). God does not forbid Christians from being happy and joyful. In fact, the
Christian's life is the most joyful of any life. A careful reading of Paul's
letter to the Philippians will prove my point. Paul exhorted the Philippians:
"Rejoice in the Lord always: and again I say, Rejoice" (Phil. 4:4).
Incidentally, at the time Paul wrote to the Philippians, he was in a Roman prison. If
a Christian can rejoice in a prison, he ought to be able to rejoice anywhere.
James asked his readers: "You adulterers and
adulteresses, do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with
God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of
God" (Jas. 4:4). The word "world" in the epistles of John and of James does not
refer to our physical universe. We are not to make a god of the creation, but we
love it because it is God's creation. The word "world" does not apply
to the people in the world. We know we are to love all people, even our
enemies. Both inspired writers use the word to mean worldliness, that is, a life of
sin and degradation. We are worldly in a biblical sense when we leave God out
of our lives.
The American entertainment industry seems to want to do
all within its power to get us to focus on having a good time. When was the last
time you saw a movie in the theater or on television that encouraged young people or
older ones to be pure in thought and in conduct? Virtually all the movies and
all television programs paint an alluring picture of all kinds of sexual
immorality. But they fail to discuss any of the consequences of such behavior.
Out-of-wedlock pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, broken hearts and
broken lives are conspicuous by their absence. The producers do not want to
focus on such negative aspects of sexual immorality. If they discussed these
negative aspects of sexual misconduct, their ratings would plunge. They would
not be able to make as much money as their desire. In almost all cases, the movies in the theater
and on television intend to deceive the viewers into accepting the philosophy:
"Eat, drink and be merry: for tomorrow you die."
But dying does not have to be a tragic event. If you
have given your life to the Lord, dying will be the step that ushers you into
the eternal kingdom of God. You will no longer have to be persecuted for your
beliefs; you will not have to suffer physical ailments. John records the Lord's
comforting message to his faithful children. "And I saw a new heaven and
a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was
no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new
Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for
her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God
is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God
himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all
tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow,
neither crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things have
passed away" (Rev. 21:1-4).
You and I both know we shall die, unless we happen to be
living when the Lord returns to claim his own. But you have a choice as to
whether you die with hope or without hope. You can have the hope of eternal life if
you believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of the living God, confess his name
before men, repent of your alien sins, are baptized into Christ for the remission of
sins and remain faithful unto the end. But if you do not obey the gospel, you will
die without hope. And what could be sadder than dying without hope? Before the
Gentiles in Ephesus had obeyed their Lord in baptism, they "were without
Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of
promise, having no hope, and without God in the world" (Eph. 2:12). If your goal
in life is to eat, drink and be merry, you have no promise of eternal life.
Paul told the Thessalonians that those who do not love
God and do not obey the gospel will be punished with everlasting destruction
from the presence of God and from the glory of his power (2 Thess. 1:8-9). You and I will spend eternity somewhere. The
choice
is ours. The Lord wants you to be saved, but you will be saved only if you
believe in Christ and obey his Gospel. If you are not a Christian or not a
faithful Christian,
will you obey our Lord this very day?
Winford Claiborne
The International Gospel Hour
P.O. Box 118
Fayetteville, TN 37334
Back to Home Page
Back to Transcripts Titles