IS EXCLUSIVISM ARROGANT?
The Tennessean, middle Tennessee’s most influential
newspaper—like most newspapers—always includes a number of “Letters to the
Editor.” Each day the editorial staff gives three stars to a letter the editors
apparently think is the best letter of the day. Sometimes the letters are quite
good, but at other times, they are so poorly reasoned one wonders how they ever
made it into publication. Do the editors of the paper delight in publishing
letters that are way out in left field?
Do they give three stars to those letters that most closely agree with
the agenda of the newspaper’s editors? Frankly, I have agonized over the
liberal and illogical messages of many of the letters to the editor.
On April 22, 2003, The Tennessean published an
Alabamian’s letter with the title “Other countries see the U. S. as arrogant.”
Tragically and inexcusably, many Americans who travel abroad give the
impression that America has the greatest history and culture in the world. That
is the reason some people in foreign countries call us “ugly Americans.” Do
some Americans appear to people of other countries to be arrogant? Is it
possible that people of other nations and cultures are simply jealous of
America’s scientific and technological accomplishments? The truth is: There is no reason for
anyone—Americans included—to be arrogant.
The letter to the editor says it is time for Americans to be honest about the religious image we present to the rest of the world. He affirms that Americans see themselves as a caring people who want to help the rest of the world to enjoy freedom of life and religion. He argues that many of us presume that we are a “Christian” nation and we assume that Jesus Christ is our model for personal behavior (p.8-A). I know America has made some tragic mistakes and continues to do so. But no nation on earth has ever done more to help other nations to be free than the United States. How many countries in history have defeated their enemies and then spent billions of dollars to help those countries rebuild? What would be the condition of nations like Germany, Italy and Japan were it not for the compassion and generosity of our great country? And would weak-kneed France even exist were it not for the United States?
I do want to say in passing that the United
States of America is not a Christian nation; it never has been and by
definition cannot be. The Bible has no pattern for making any nation Christian.
There are millions of devoutly religious people in our country, but that does
not make the United States a Christian nation. The vast majority of so-called
“founding fathers” claimed to be Christians, but never were the majority of
Americans Christians, almost regardless of how one defines the term
“Christian.”
The letter writer says Americans have a
problem we almost never consider with openness and honesty. And what is that problem he so wisely
understands that the rest of us ignore? “The posture of our religious bearing
to the world at large is one of basic arrogance.” Please listen carefully to
this writer’s conclusion. “Our traditional presentations of our faith propagate
the belief that only those of us who are Christian really know God. Our
commitment to culturally influenced visions of Christianity as superior to
other faiths paints a picture of a faithful people with haughty, theological
manners” (p.8-A). It would take a full-length book to deal with the
observations this man makes about Christianity, but I shall respond as time
permits to some of his views.
Are Christians the only ones who can really
know God? You may not agree with what I am about to tell you, but those who
have committed their lives to Christ must accept his word on every topic,
including the truth about God. If we are truly followers of Jesus Christ, how
can we entertain views on any topic that differ from his? What he thought about God or about the plan
of salvation or about moral values, we must think. Is that not what having the
mind of Christ means? Paul charged the Philippians: “Let this mind be in you,
which was also in Christ Jesus” (Phil. 2:5)
Jesus had much to say about his Father. How
could it be otherwise since he was the very Son of Almighty God? No founder of
any other religion could make that claim and prove it to be true. I am aware that founders of some cultic
groups have claimed to be manifestations of God, but no knowledgeable Bible
student has taken them seriously. Those
religious leaders did not and could not prove by supernatural means that they
were God manifest in the flesh. Yet Jesus was marked out to “the Son of God
with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the
dead (Rom. 1:4). Luke says that Jesus
“showed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs” (Acts l: 3).
Who but God manifest in the flesh has the power to lay down his life and the
power to take it up again (John 10:18)?
Will you please listen to what John writes
about Jesus Christ? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were
made by him; and without Him was not anything made that was made. In him was
life, and the life was the light of men…He was in the world, and the world was
made by him, and the world knew him not” (John 1:1-4, 10). The affirmations
contained in these verses could not be said about the founder of any other
religion or about any other religious teacher. Please think about John’s
statements. Jesus Christ—the Word—existed from eternity past. He was with God
in the beginning and he is God. He—not the founder of any other religion and
not Shirley MacLaine—was the Creator of the world. It is in him and in him
alone that men can have eternal life. The apostle John adds: “And the Word
became flesh and dwelled among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of
the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).
From what I have read to you in the book of
John, would you not expect that Jesus Christ alone had complete access to the
mind of God? He alone is the Word made flesh; he alone has existed with God
from eternity past; he alone made the world and provides for life eternal. The
apostle John affirms: “No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten Son,
who is in the bosom of the Father, has declared him” (John 1:18). The word
“declared” in the Greek means to reveal, to explain, to make known. Only Jesus had existed from the beginning
with God and only he could fully explain the Father.
On one occasion, Jesus informed the apostles
that he would soon be leaving them. They wanted to know where he was going,
although he had told them before that he was returning to the Father. He said
to them, “And where I go you know, and the way you know.” Thomas asked, “Lord
we do not know where you are going; and how can we know the way?” Jesus told
him: “I am the way, the truth and the life; no man comes unto the Father, but
by me. If you had known me, you should have known my Father also: and from
henceforth you know him, and have seen him.” The Lord’s statements must have
surprised even shocked the apostle Philip. He pleaded with Jesus: “Show us the
Father and it suffices us.” Our Lord’s reply to Philip is one of the most
remarkable teachings from Genesis to Revelation. Jesus said to Philip: “He who has seen me has seen the Father”
(John 14:3-9).
Do we have adequate reasons to believe what
Jesus said to Philip? Thomas Carlyle was speaking with a friend about Jesus. He
quoted our Lord’s words to Philip: “He who has seen me has seen the Father.”
The friend said to Carlyle: “I could say the same thing.” Carlyle responded:
“But Jesus got people to believe it.” We know beyond any doubt that Jesus is
indeed equal with the Father (John 5:17)—that he and God are one (John
17:21-22). Since he is God the Son and
has existed with God the Father from eternity, would he not be in a perfect
position to know God and to reveal his will to fallen men? The apostle Peter wrote of Christ’s precious
blood, “as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: who verily was
foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last
times for you, who by him do believe in God, who raised him from the dead, and
gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God” (1 Pet. 1:19-21). To
put it as precisely and concisely as I am able: We have in Christ the complete
and perfect revelation of God the Father.
Since Christ is God and had been with God the
Father from the beginning, should he not know the moral and spiritual condition
of man? Is it even remotely possible that anyone could speak on matters of
salvation with the same authority Christ possesses? Just before Christ ascended
to the Father to await his second coming, he explained the authority God had
given him and then gave this beautiful and powerful commission to them. “All
authority is given unto me in heaven and in earth, Go therefore, and teach all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded
you: and, lo, I am with you all the way, even to the end of the age” (Mt.
28:18-20).
What purpose does baptism serve in the scheme
of human redemption? Mark’s account of the Great Commission gives us some
insight. “He who believes and is baptized shall be saved; but he who does not
believe shall be condemned” (Mk. 16:16).
If you have any doubt about the meaning of baptism, please listen to the
climax to Peter’s sermon on Pentecost. When the Jews asked Peter and the other
apostles, “Men and brethren, what shall we do?” Peter by divine guidance answered: “Repent, and be baptized
everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you
shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is unto you, and to
your children, and to all who are afar off, even as many as the Lord your God
shall call” (Acts 2:38-39).
Incidentally, when the three thousand Jews on Pentecost responded to the
Lord’s command by repenting and being baptized, were they born again? If they
were not, what further steps did they have to take to be born again?
No sane person believes that anyone who has
committed himself to Christ always lives above sin. We all have sinned and
continue to come short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23). But teachings of Christ
and of his apostles provide the foundation for the moral values God demands
that we honor in our daily lives. The first step for the newly converted person
is to remember the words: “Seek first the kingdom of God, and his
righteousness: and all these things shall be added unto you” (Mt. 6:33). Paul outlines what it means to continually
seek God’s kingdom and his righteousness. “If you then be risen with Christ,
seek those things that are above, where Christ sits on the right hand of God.
Set your affection of things above, not on things on the earth. For you are
dead, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life,
shall appear, then shall you also appear with him is glory.” Paul commands
Christians to mortify our members that are upon the earth—sexual immorality,
uncleanness, evil passions, covetousness, which is idolatry. We must put off
the old man with his deeds and put on the new man “which is renewed in
knowledge after the image of him who created him” (Col. 3:1-10).
We must freely admit that some of the world
religions and cultic groups teach many of these ideas and concepts. In many
cases—although not in all—they teach these truths because of their indebtedness
to either the Old Testament or to the New. But no other religion or cult or
sect teaches the whole truth about God, about salvation and about righteous
moral values. Many of the adherents of the other religions are good moral
people. They do not lie, steal or abuse their wives and children. They pay
their taxes and are responsible citizens of the countries where they live. But
they do not believe in Christ and will die in their sins (John 8:24). But am I
not being intolerant? If these were my words, the answer would be yes. They are
not my words; they are the words of God’s Holy Spirit. They come from the very
mind of God almighty (1 Cor. 2:6-13).
The letter writer says: “Our commitment to
culturally influenced visions of Christianity as superior to other faiths
paints a picture of a faithful people with haughty, theological manners” (p.
8-A). Am I preaching “culturally
influenced visions of Christ” when I tell people: Jesus is “the way, the truth
and the life?” If Christianity is not superior to all other faiths, then I may
be haughty in my theological manners. The author of Hebrews argues that the
gospel is greater than the law of Moses (Heb. 1:5-7). Until the gospel came,
the Mosaic covenant was the best law any people had ever known. But the gospel
is better in every way than the Old Testament law. From a biblical viewpoint,
there is no question of the gospel’s superiority to every other religious
worldview. If that is arrogant, it is because Christ and his apostles were
arrogant. That is precisely what they taught. Are you happy to accuse Christ of
being arrogant?
The following excerpt from the letter to The
Tennessean defies logic. “Thoughtfully and theologically, I cannot
imagine the Jesus of the scriptures being proud of such pride-filled piety
among his personal followers” (p. 8-A). What the letter writer imagines has
absolutely nothing to do with the facts in the case. What did Jesus teach about his knowledge of God and about his
place in the plan of salvation? Did not
Jesus affirm: “Except you believe that I am he, you shall die in your sins”
(John 8:24)? Can you imagine a more exclusive claim than that? You may or may
not believe what Jesus taught—and that is your prerogative—but how can there be
any debate about his meaning? And how could words be more exclusive than these
words: “I am the way, the truth and the life. No man comes to the Father, but
by me” (John 14:6)? Christ’s Parable of the Good Shepherd can hardly be
misunderstood. “Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep…I am
the good shepherd: the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep” (John 10:7,
11)
The apostles Peter and John healed a man who
was born lame. The Jewish leaders could not deny that a notable miracle had
been done, but they were angry with the apostles. They were afraid that their
followers would grasp the significance of he miracle and desert Judaism for
Christianity. The apostle Peter quoted
the prophet Isaiah’s prediction about the Jews’ rejection of their Messiah
(Isa. 28:16). “This is the stone that was rejected by your builders, which has
become the head of the corner” (Acts 4:11). Peter then said to the Jews:
“Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is no other name under
heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).
Millions of people who claim to be
Christians, including prominent evangelicals like Clark Pinnock, reject the
apostle Peter’s words, but that in no way changes their significance. According
to the apostle Peter, salvation is in Christ alone and in no other. To
unbelievers and to liberal theologians, these words appear intolerant and
bigoted, but all the Bible writers taught the same truth on this topic. There
is no other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. Those
who reject Christ reject God. They have no hope of eternal salvation. Is that
the message Jesus Christ and his apostles intended for Christians in every age
to teach? Is that the only message that
will save men and women from eternal damnation? Paul told the Romans: “I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ:
for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one who believes; to the Jew
first, and also to the Greek. For therein (that is, in the gospel of Christ) is
righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just
shall live by faith” (Rom. 1:16-17).
Please meditate on the following questions
relating to our topic, “Is Exclusivism Arrogant?” Have there been professed
Christians who have shown a spirit of arrogance in preaching Jesus as our only
Savior? If you know human nature, you know there have been. Does that mean that
everyone who preaches Christian exclusivism is arrogant? If we believe that Jesus Christ is the Son
of God, that the apostles were inspired of God, what choice do we have about
preaching Jesus Christ as our only-Savior? If we can be saved without believing
in Christ and obeying his gospel, was not God cruel in sending Jesus into the
world to suffer and to die for our salvation?
If you are not a Christian, I urge you to
confess your faith in Christ, to repent of your alien sins and to be baptized
into Christ for the remission of sins.
Then walk in the light as Christ is in the light that you may continue
to have the remission of sins (1 John 1:7).
Winford Claiborne
The
International Gospel Hour
P.O.
Box 118
Fayetteville,
TN 37334
Back
to Home Page
Back to Transcripts Titles